Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add cluster-autoscaler options to machine deployment #831

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 17, 2024

Conversation

aaronfern
Copy link
Contributor

How to categorize this PR?

/area auto-scaling
/kind enhancement
/platform azure

What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR adds cluster-autoscaler options for worker groups from workers to machine deployments. These options allow users to specify some cluster-autoscaler specific for worker groups

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes partially gardener/autoscaler#240

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

NodeGroupAutoscalingOptions can now be specified per worker group via the worker through the field `worker.spec.pools.clusterAutoscaler`

@aaronfern aaronfern requested review from a team as code owners April 16, 2024 14:05
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added needs/review Needs review area/auto-scaling Auto-scaling (CA/HPA/VPA/HVPA, predominantly control plane, but also otherwise) related kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension platform/azure Microsoft Azure platform/infrastructure size/s Size of pull request is small (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) labels Apr 16, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-3 gardener-robot-ci-3 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Apr 16, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) and removed reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) labels Apr 16, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@kon-angelo kon-angelo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@kon-angelo kon-angelo merged commit 5e5dc56 into gardener:master Apr 17, 2024
15 checks passed
@gardener-robot gardener-robot added reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging status/closed Issue is closed (either delivered or triaged) and removed needs/review Needs review labels Apr 17, 2024
@gardener-robot-ci-1 gardener-robot-ci-1 added the reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) label Apr 17, 2024
AndreasBurger pushed a commit to AndreasBurger/gardener-extension-provider-azure that referenced this pull request Apr 23, 2024
@aaronfern aaronfern deleted the worker_options branch May 28, 2024 10:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/auto-scaling Auto-scaling (CA/HPA/VPA/HVPA, predominantly control plane, but also otherwise) related kind/enhancement Enhancement, improvement, extension needs/ok-to-test Needs approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) platform/azure Microsoft Azure platform/infrastructure reviewed/lgtm Has approval for merging reviewed/ok-to-test Has approval for testing (check PR in detail before setting this label because PR is run on CI/CD) size/s Size of pull request is small (see gardener-robot robot/bots/size.py) status/closed Issue is closed (either delivered or triaged)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants