-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CV2-5086 Move Smooch NLU to presto #1996
Closed
DGaffney
wants to merge
16
commits into
epic/cv2-5050-text-vectorization-via-presto
from
cv2-5086-smooch-nlu-presto
Closed
Changes from 5 commits
Commits
Show all changes
16 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
0b96781
CV2-5086 Move Smooch NLU to presto
DGaffney f633165
update stubs
DGaffney aba56f8
shift test stubs
DGaffney 4b777f0
minor tweak
DGaffney f1f3b6c
Export lists (#1992)
caiosba 5a1dad9
Merge branch 'epic/cv2-5050-text-vectorization-via-presto' into cv2-5…
DGaffney 72503a0
run tests(github actions) on other branches (#2007)
chinelo-obitube c1c9b20
Adjust Smooch Bot provider when tipline is running both CAPI and Smoo…
caiosba b5e6b5d
Export lists (#1992)
caiosba b373201
run tests(github actions) on other branches (#2007)
chinelo-obitube 90ab045
Adjust Smooch Bot provider when tipline is running both CAPI and Smoo…
caiosba 5257311
run tests(github actions) on other branches (#2008)
chinelo-obitube 2eb3faf
resolve
DGaffney 1d03987
simplify calls and bring back in line with latest naming convention
DGaffney 8001c35
Updating Rubocop file
caiosba 2b87999
rebasing
DGaffney File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -576,4 +576,4 @@ def restrict_contexts(project_media, project_media_id_scores) | |
}] | ||
end | ||
end | ||
end | ||
end |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This can be simplified further, it seems... you don't need
alegre_operation
anymore, since the calls were moved to the condition blocks... right?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
you're right! Updated.