Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[OPENJDK-3038] echo out Tech Preview warning #527

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 4, 2024

Conversation

jmtd
Copy link
Member

@jmtd jmtd commented Nov 26, 2024

The jlink feature will initially ship as TP.

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OPENJDK-3038

@jmtd jmtd requested a review from Josh-Matsuoka November 26, 2024 16:58
@jmtd jmtd force-pushed the OPENJDK-3038-tech-preview branch from debd1d9 to a816cfb Compare November 27, 2024 14:36
@jmtd
Copy link
Member Author

jmtd commented Nov 27, 2024

I don't think the test is quite right yet.

@jmtd jmtd force-pushed the OPENJDK-3038-tech-preview branch from a816cfb to 6cfecc7 Compare November 28, 2024 11:30
@jmtd
Copy link
Member Author

jmtd commented Nov 28, 2024

Test fixed, but relies upon cekit/behave-test-steps#73

The jlink feature will initially ship as TP.

Repurpose older unit test to check for the TP warning (older test
is redundant as it only worked if jmods are installed). The test
depends upon this being merged first:
cekit/behave-test-steps#73

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OPENJDK-3038

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Dowland <[email protected]>
@jmtd jmtd force-pushed the OPENJDK-3038-tech-preview branch from 6cfecc7 to 4f67aa3 Compare December 2, 2024 14:44
@jmtd jmtd merged commit 6548e31 into rh-openjdk:jlink-dev Dec 4, 2024
1 of 6 checks passed
@jmtd jmtd deleted the OPENJDK-3038-tech-preview branch December 4, 2024 14:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants