-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Optimize UnDerefer
#99667
Optimize UnDerefer
#99667
Conversation
Some changes occurred to MIR optimizations cc @rust-lang/wg-mir-opt |
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
Awaiting bors try build completion. @rustbot label: +S-waiting-on-perf |
⌛ Trying commit 4e726e0 with merge 8031317c89b74b4d7df7bd6f3f000fafec11203d... |
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
Queued 8031317c89b74b4d7df7bd6f3f000fafec11203d with parent 7f93d4a, future comparison URL. |
Finished benchmarking commit (8031317c89b74b4d7df7bd6f3f000fafec11203d): comparison url. Instruction countThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Max RSS (memory usage)This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. CyclesResults
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. Benchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf. @bors rollup=never Footnotes |
@bors r+ |
☀️ Test successful - checks-actions |
Finished benchmarking commit (7dfdd64): comparison url. Instruction count
Max RSS (memory usage)This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. CyclesResults
If you disagree with this performance assessment, please file an issue in rust-lang/rustc-perf. @rustbot label: -perf-regression Footnotes |
Addresses the performance issues faced here.
r? @oli-obk