-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix(app): add hotfixes #3173
fix(app): add hotfixes #3173
Conversation
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThis pull request includes a variety of changes across multiple files, primarily focusing on simplifying logic, enhancing data handling, and improving localization features. Key modifications involve the removal of unnecessary configurations, updates to hooks for better state management, and enhancements to report handling in the database. Additionally, improvements to language handling and translation mechanisms are introduced, alongside adjustments to user interface components for better clarity and functionality. Changes
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for staging-organized ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 11
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (13)
src/features/meetings/weekly_schedules/midweek_meeting/useMidweekMeeting.tsx (1)
173-189
: LGTM! Consider extracting time format logic to a utility function.The time format handling logic is correct and properly integrated with the existing code. However, since this logic is also used in the weekend meeting hook, consider extracting it to a shared utility function to promote code reuse and maintainability.
// Create a new utility function in @utils/date.ts +export const formatTimeByPreference = (time: string, use24: boolean): string => { + if (!use24) { + const date = generateDateFromTime(time); + return formatDate(date, 'h:mm'); + } + return time; +}; // Then use it in both hooks -if (!use24) { - const date = generateDateFromTime(pgmStart); - meetingStart = formatDate(date, 'h:mm'); -} +meetingStart = formatTimeByPreference(pgmStart, use24);src/services/app/schedules.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-2500
: File is too large and should be split into smaller modules.This file is over 2000 lines long and handles multiple concerns. Consider splitting it into smaller, focused modules:
schedulesMidweek.ts
: Midweek meeting related functionsschedulesWeekend.ts
: Weekend meeting related functionsschedulesHistory.ts
: Assignment history related functionsschedulesAutofill.ts
: Auto-fill related functionsschedulesCommon.ts
: Shared utilities and typesThis would improve maintainability, readability, and testability.
src/services/dexie/cong_field_service_reports.ts (1)
175-177
: Consider usingDate
objects for accurate date comparisonIn the sorting of
month.reports
to find the least recently updated report, usinglocaleCompare
on date strings may not handle all cases reliably. Consider parsing theupdatedAt
strings intoDate
objects and comparing them numerically for more accurate results.Apply this diff to improve date comparison:
- .sort((a, b) => - a.report_data.updatedAt.localeCompare(b.report_data.updatedAt) - ) + .sort((a, b) => + new Date(a.report_data.updatedAt) - new Date(b.report_data.updatedAt) + )src/services/i18n/public_talks.ts (1)
5-5
: Add type safety for the language parameterConsider adding type safety to ensure the language parameter matches the expected format.
-export const publicTalksBuildList = (language: string) => { +type SupportedLanguage = typeof LANGUAGE_LIST[number]['locale']; +export const publicTalksBuildList = (language: SupportedLanguage) => {src/features/app_start/shared/hooks/useFeedback.tsx (2)
Line range hint
21-25
: Add null check to showMessage functionThe
showMessage
function directly accessesonboardingError
without checking if it exists, which could cause runtime errors.Apply this fix:
const showMessage = () => { + if (!onboardingError) return; onboardingError.style.opacity = '0'; onboardingError.style.display = 'block'; onboardingError.style.animation = 'fade-in 0.15s forwards'; };
Line range hint
11-25
: Consider refactoring DOM manipulation to use React refsDirect DOM manipulation using
document.querySelector
is an anti-pattern in React. Consider using refs instead.Here's a suggested refactor:
const useFeedback = () => { const title = useRecoilValue(onboardingTitleState); const message = useRecoilValue(onboardingMessageState); const variant = useRecoilValue(onboardingVariantState); const errorRef = useRef<HTMLElement>(null); const hideMessage = () => { if (errorRef.current) { errorRef.current.style.animation = 'fade-out 0.15s forwards'; } }; const showMessage = () => { if (!errorRef.current) return; errorRef.current.style.opacity = '0'; errorRef.current.style.display = 'block'; errorRef.current.style.animation = 'fade-in 0.15s forwards'; }; return { title, message, variant, hideMessage, showMessage, errorRef }; };src/features/app_start/vip/startup/index.tsx (2)
31-48
: Simplify conditional rendering logicThe nested conditional structure makes the code harder to maintain and reason about. Consider using a more declarative approach.
Here's a suggested refactor:
const renderContent = () => { if (isUserSignIn) return <Signin />; if (isUserMfaVerify) return <VerifyMFA />; if (isUserAccountCreated) return <UserAccountCreated />; if (isCongCreate) return <CongregationCreate />; if (isEmailAuth) return <EmailAuth />; if (isEmailLinkAuth) return <EmailLinkAuthentication />; if (!isCongCreate && isEncryptionCodeOpen) return <CongregationEncryption />; return null; }; return ( <> <TermsUse /> {!isCongCreate && !isEncryptionCodeOpen && isLoading && ( <WaitingLoader type="lottie" variant="standard" /> )} {!isLoading && renderContent()} </> );
31-48
: Consider memoizing conditional componentsThe multiple boolean checks could lead to unnecessary re-renders. Consider using React.memo for the child components and useMemo for the conditions.
Example:
const ConditionalEncryption = memo(() => ( !isCongCreate && isEncryptionCodeOpen ? <CongregationEncryption /> : null )); const AuthContent = memo(() => ( <> {isUserMfaVerify && <VerifyMFA />} {isUserAccountCreated && <UserAccountCreated />} {isCongCreate && <CongregationCreate />} {isEmailAuth && <EmailAuth />} {isEmailLinkAuth && <EmailLinkAuthentication />} <ConditionalEncryption /> </> ));src/services/i18n/index.ts (1)
Line range hint
22-72
: Consider optimizing locale file loading.The current implementation loads locale files sequentially. Consider loading them in parallel for better performance.
-for await (const record of languages) { +await Promise.all(languages.map(async (record) => { const language = record.locale; const [ activities, congregation, // ... other imports ] = await Promise.all([ import(`@locales/${language}/activities.json`), import(`@locales/${language}/congregation.json`), // ... other imports ]).then(modules => modules.map(m => m.default)); resources[record.identifier] = { ui: { ...activities, ...congregation, // ... other spreads }, // ... other namespaces }; +}));src/features/reminders/useReminders.tsx (1)
47-67
: Consider extracting date comparison logicThe date comparison logic is duplicated between
checkPubReport
andcheckBranchReport
. Consider extracting this into a shared utility function.+const isWithinReportWindow = (nextMonth: number, startDay: number, endDay: number) => { + const todayMonth = new Date().getMonth(); + const todayDate = new Date().getDate(); + return nextMonth === todayMonth && todayDate >= startDay && todayDate <= endDay; +}; const checkBranchReport = useMemo(() => { if (!isSecretary) return false; // ... other checks ... - const nextMonth = addMonths(`${currentReport}/01`, 1).getMonth(); - const todayMonth = new Date().getMonth(); - const todayDate = new Date().getDate(); - if (nextMonth === todayMonth && todayDate >= 10 && todayDate <= 28) { + if (isWithinReportWindow(nextMonth, 10, 28)) { return true; } return false; }, [branchReports, currentReport, isSecretary]);src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_create/congregation_access_code/useCongregationAccessCode.tsx (1)
Line range hint
35-80
: Consider enhancing error handling for access code setupWhile reviewing the access code setup, consider adding more specific error handling for different failure scenarios (network issues, validation failures, etc.).
try { const encryptionKey = generateKey(); + if (!encryptionKey) { + throw new Error('ENCRYPTION_KEY_GENERATION_FAILED'); + } const encryptedKey = encryptData(encryptionKey, tmpAccessCode); + if (!encryptedKey) { + throw new Error('ENCRYPTION_FAILED'); + } const { status, data } = await apiSetCongregationAccessCode(encryptedKey);src/features/ministry/report/publisher_report/monthly_report/submit_report/useSubmitReport.tsx (1)
150-162
: LGTM: Improved type safety and report handlingThe changes enhance type safety and immutability through proper typing and structuredClone usage. Consider extracting the UUID generation into a utility function for reusability.
+// In a utility file +export const generateReportId = () => crypto.randomUUID(); - report.report_id = crypto.randomUUID(); + report.report_id = generateReportId();src/features/app_notification/container/useContainer.tsx (1)
309-311
: LGTM: Secure access code handling for reportsThe implementation follows the established pattern for secure data access. Consider enhancing error handling to specifically catch database access errors.
try { const incoming = data?.result?.incoming_reports; if (!incoming) return; - const settings = await appDb.app_settings.get(1); + try { + const settings = await appDb.app_settings.get(1); + } catch (dbError) { + console.error('Failed to access app settings:', dbError); + throw new Error('error_app_settings_access'); + } const congAccessCode = settings.cong_settings.cong_access_code;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (35)
.firebaserc
(0 hunks)src/RootWrap.tsx
(1 hunks)src/constants/index.ts
(2 hunks)src/definition/ministry.ts
(0 hunks)src/features/app_notification/container/useContainer.tsx
(10 hunks)src/features/app_start/shared/hooks/useFeedback.tsx
(1 hunks)src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_create/congregation_access_code/useCongregationAccessCode.tsx
(1 hunks)src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_create/congregation_details/useCongregationDetails.tsx
(1 hunks)src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_create/congregation_master_key/useCongregationMasterKey.tsx
(1 hunks)src/features/app_start/vip/startup/index.tsx
(1 hunks)src/features/app_start/vip/startup/useStartup.tsx
(1 hunks)src/features/language_switcher/useLanguage.tsx
(2 hunks)src/features/meetings/weekly_schedules/midweek_meeting/useMidweekMeeting.tsx
(3 hunks)src/features/meetings/weekly_schedules/weekend_meeting/useWeekendMeeting.tsx
(4 hunks)src/features/ministry/report/publisher_report/monthly_report/submit_report/useSubmitReport.tsx
(2 hunks)src/features/ministry/report/publisher_report/monthly_report/withdraw_report/useWithdrawReport.tsx
(3 hunks)src/features/persons/spiritual_status/baptized_publisher/useBaptizedPublisher.tsx
(1 hunks)src/features/reminders/useReminders.tsx
(2 hunks)src/features/reports/hooks/useCongregationCard.tsx
(2 hunks)src/features/whats_new/useWhatsNew.tsx
(2 hunks)src/hooks/useAppTranslation.tsx
(1 hunks)src/hooks/useUserAutoLogin.tsx
(3 hunks)src/pages/ministry/ministry_report/index.tsx
(2 hunks)src/pages/ministry/ministry_report/useMinistryReport.tsx
(4 hunks)src/services/app/index.ts
(3 hunks)src/services/app/schedules.ts
(3 hunks)src/services/dexie/app.ts
(0 hunks)src/services/dexie/cong_field_service_reports.ts
(3 hunks)src/services/i18n/index.ts
(3 hunks)src/services/i18n/public_talks.ts
(1 hunks)src/services/i18n/songs.ts
(1 hunks)src/services/i18n/translation.ts
(2 hunks)src/services/worker/backupUtils.ts
(1 hunks)src/states/app.ts
(1 hunks)src/views/reports/S21/shared/TableHeader.tsx
(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- .firebaserc
- src/services/dexie/app.ts
- src/definition/ministry.ts
🔇 Additional comments (28)
src/features/meetings/weekly_schedules/weekend_meeting/useWeekendMeeting.tsx (1)
Line range hint 189-211
: Duplicate time format logic should be consolidated.
This implementation mirrors the time format handling in the midweek meeting hook. As suggested in the previous comment, this logic should be extracted to a shared utility function to avoid duplication.
src/services/app/schedules.ts (1)
2057-2064
: Time format logic appears in multiple places.
This is the third occurrence of similar time format conversion logic. As suggested earlier, this should be consolidated into a shared utility function.
src/services/dexie/cong_field_service_reports.ts (1)
Line range hint 1-187
: Overall, the code changes enhance report management effectively
The updates to dbHandleIncomingReports
and the addition of dbRemoveDuplicateReports
improve the handling of incoming reports and duplicate detection. The implementation is clear and aligns with the objectives.
src/services/worker/backupUtils.ts (1)
1241-1243
: Ensure consistent report identification throughout the codebase
By changing the report identification criteria from report_id
to person_uid
and report_month
, verify that this modification is consistently applied across all related functions to prevent mismatches or missed reports during backup and restore operations.
src/views/reports/S21/shared/TableHeader.tsx (1)
14-14
: LGTM! Verify PDF rendering.
The addition of line breaks after hyphens in the service year text should improve readability in the PDF output.
Please verify the PDF rendering with different service year translations to ensure proper text wrapping:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more context about the translation keys and their usage.
Let me check the PDF styles and layout context to ensure this change is appropriate.
Based on the analysis of the TableHeader.tsx and its styles, I can now generate the final response:
LGTM - Line break addition is appropriate for PDF layout
The change to add line breaks after hyphens in the service year text is well-implemented:
- It's used in a PDF-specific component (@react-pdf/renderer)
- The column width is fixed at 80px (styles.column1)
- The font size is small (9px for columnHeader)
- The technique using Unicode line feed is standard for PDF text formatting
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all occurrences of tr_serviceYear translations to verify potential hyphenation cases
rg "tr_serviceYear" --type ts
Length of output: 696
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find translation files that might contain tr_serviceYear
fd -e json -e ts "translation|i18n" --exec rg -l "tr_serviceYear"
# Check the TableHeader.tsx file content for more context
cat src/views/reports/S21/shared/TableHeader.tsx
Length of output: 2005
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the styles file referenced in TableHeader.tsx
cat src/views/reports/S21/shared/index.styles.ts
# Look for other PDF files that might use similar hyphenation technique
rg -l "\u000A" --type ts
Length of output: 2757
src/pages/ministry/ministry_report/useMinistryReport.tsx (2)
21-33
: LGTM! Robust status computation.
The memoized reportStatus computation correctly:
- Finds the matching report by date
- Handles the case when no report exists
- Properly prioritizes 'pending' status
50-56
: Verify the modal state transitions.
The modal handling logic has been updated to use reportStatus with expanded conditions for the withdraw modal.
Let's verify all possible status transitions:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response:
Modal state transitions are correctly implemented and aligned with the report status flow.
The codebase shows a consistent status flow:
- 'pending' → 'submitted' → 'received' → 'confirmed'
- The submit modal opens only for 'pending' status
- The withdraw modal opens for both 'submitted' and 'received' statuses
- The withdraw action correctly resets status back to 'pending'
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Find all status-related transitions and handlers
rg "status.*=.*['\"](?:pending|submitted|received|confirmed)" --type ts
# Find related modal handlers
rg "(?:handleOpenModal|setSubmitOpen|setWithdrawOpen)" --type ts
Length of output: 7307
src/pages/ministry/ministry_report/index.tsx (1)
24-24
: LGTM! Clear and consistent variable renaming.
The renaming from status
to reportStatus
improves code clarity by being more specific about what the status represents. The button's conditional rendering logic remains functionally equivalent.
Also applies to: 36-40
src/services/i18n/index.ts (1)
94-96
: LGTM! Clear i18n configuration.
The i18n configuration is properly set up with the new identifier-based approach and appropriate fallback language.
src/features/reports/hooks/useCongregationCard.tsx (1)
5-5
: Verify impact on existing reports after service year calculation change
The switch to using currentServiceYear
better aligns with the organizational calendar, but we should verify this doesn't affect existing reports.
Also applies to: 21-24
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the date utilities and their usage to better understand the impact.
Based on the comprehensive analysis of the codebase, I can now provide the final response:
The service year calculation change is safe and properly implemented
The switch from currentReportMonth
to currentServiceYear
in useCongregationCard.tsx
is part of a well-structured system where:
currentServiceYear
correctly handles the September-August service year calculation- The change aligns with existing service year calculations used throughout the application
- Existing reports are protected as they use
createArrayFromMonths
which maintains chronological order regardless of the year calculation method
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other uses of currentReportMonth to ensure consistent updates
rg "currentReportMonth"
# Check for any date-related calculations in report processing
ast-grep --pattern 'const $_ = $$$Month'
Length of output: 3691
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of currentServiceYear and currentReportMonth
cat src/utils/date.ts
# Look for service year related calculations
rg "serviceYear" -A 3
# Check for month-based calculations in reports
ast-grep --pattern 'createArrayFromMonths($$$)'
Length of output: 49386
src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_create/congregation_master_key/useCongregationMasterKey.tsx (1)
61-61
: Verify consistent usage of cong_new flag
The addition of 'cong_settings.cong_new': true
needs to be consistently applied across all congregation creation flows.
Consider centralizing congregation initialization settings in a single configuration object to ensure consistency.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response:
Usage of cong_settings.cong_new is consistent across the codebase
The flag is correctly set to true
during congregation creation flows (in congregation_master_key, congregation_details, and congregation_access_code) and properly set to false
in all other contexts (initial setup, demo notice, authentication flows). This maintains a clear distinction between new and existing congregations.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other occurrences of cong_new setting
rg "'cong_settings\.cong_new':" -A 1
# Search for congregation creation related functions
ast-grep --pattern 'function $_($$) {
$$$
dbAppSettingsUpdate($$$)
$$$
}'
Length of output: 2252
src/RootWrap.tsx (1)
24-24
: Verify the impact of removing URL-based font configuration
The simplified font retrieval logic removes URL parameter handling. Please confirm if this was an intentionally removed feature or if it's still needed by users/testing.
src/features/reminders/useReminders.tsx (2)
15-16
: Improved publisher check logic with proper memoization
The refactoring to useMemo
with proper dependency tracking is a good improvement. The early returns make the code more maintainable.
Also applies to: 19-19, 27-45
88-109
: Improved state management with single update
The refactoring to collect all reminders before a single setReminders
call is a good improvement for performance.
src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_create/congregation_access_code/useCongregationAccessCode.tsx (1)
63-63
: Verify the impact of the new congregation flag
The addition of cong_settings.cong_new
flag needs verification across the codebase to ensure it's properly handled in all congregation-related flows.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now provide a definitive response about the cong_settings.cong_new
flag:
The cong_new
flag is properly handled across the codebase
The flag is used consistently throughout the application to manage the congregation setup flow:
- It's set to
true
during initial congregation creation in the setup flows - It's properly cleared (
false
) after setup completion in multiple places:- Initial setup completion
- OAuth authentication
- Email link authentication
- MFA verification
- Demo notice handling
The flag is also:
- Properly defined in schema and type definitions
- Used in root layout for conditional rendering
- Backed up and restored correctly during data migrations
- Handled securely with proper encryption settings
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other uses of cong_new setting
rg "cong_new" --type ts --type tsx
# Search for congregation settings handling
rg "cong_settings\." --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 134
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other uses of cong_new setting without file type restrictions
rg "cong_new"
# Search for congregation settings handling without file type restrictions
rg "cong_settings\."
# Find all TypeScript/React files that might contain congregation settings
fd "\.(ts|tsx)$" | xargs rg "cong_settings"
Length of output: 71514
src/features/whats_new/useWhatsNew.tsx (2)
25-30
: LGTM: Robust language identifier handling
The implementation correctly handles language mapping with a proper fallback to appLang
if no identifier is found in LANGUAGE_LIST
.
33-33
: Verify language resources availability
Ensure that all required language resources are available in i18n options for each identifier.
src/features/app_start/vip/congregation_create/congregation_details/useCongregationDetails.tsx (1)
139-139
: Verify the impact of new congregation flag
The addition of cong_settings.cong_new
flag could affect other parts of the application that might rely on this setting.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response as I have comprehensive information about how the cong_settings.cong_new
flag is used throughout the codebase:
The cong_new
flag is used consistently and safely
The flag is used appropriately across the codebase:
- Set to
true
only during congregation creation process in related files - Properly reset to
false
after initial setup, authentication, and demo flows - Used for controlling initialization flows and UI states in dashboard and root layout
- Backed up correctly in backup utilities
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for usages of cong_new setting
rg -A 3 "cong_settings\.cong_new|settings\['cong_settings'\]\.cong_new"
# Search for related congregation settings checks
ast-grep --pattern 'settings.cong_settings'
Length of output: 22765
src/constants/index.ts (2)
22-22
: LGTM: Added standard language identifier for Tagalog
The addition of identifier: 'tgl'
follows ISO 639-3 language code standards for Tagalog.
68-68
: Fixed: Hungarian locale code
Corrected the Hungarian locale from 'hy-HU' to 'hu-HU'. The previous code was incorrect as 'hy' is the language code for Armenian.
src/features/app_start/vip/startup/useStartup.tsx (1)
172-175
: LGTM: Enhanced validation for encryption code dialog
The additional check congName.length > 0
ensures the encryption code dialog only appears when there's an actual congregation name, preventing premature dialog display.
src/features/persons/spiritual_status/baptized_publisher/useBaptizedPublisher.tsx (2)
195-197
: LGTM: Enhanced validation for baptism history creation
The additional check for firstReport.length === 0
prevents duplicate history entries by ensuring a new history record is only created when there's no existing first report.
187-187
: Improved code readability
Added line break to separate the baptism date update from the history creation logic.
src/hooks/useUserAutoLogin.tsx (2)
193-205
: LGTM: Worker message flow is well-structured
The sequence of worker messages follows a logical order, setting up the necessary context before starting the worker.
282-294
: LGTM: Consistent worker message implementation
The worker message implementation maintains consistency with the VIP flow, ensuring uniform behavior across account types.
src/features/app_notification/container/useContainer.tsx (2)
271-273
: LGTM: Consistent pattern for sensitive data handling
The implementation maintains consistency with the established pattern of secure database access for sensitive information.
159-161
: LGTM: Secure handling of sensitive data
The change appropriately moves sensitive data retrieval from global state to direct database access.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response since I have enough context to verify the security handling of the master key. The search shows:
- The master key is properly handled through database access and encryption services
- It's used consistently for encrypting/decrypting sensitive data
- The implementation follows security best practices with proper access controls
- The UI/UX properly guides users on secure master key management
LGTM: Secure implementation of congregation master key handling
The change from Recoil state to direct database access is appropriate and maintains security through:
- Proper encryption/decryption utilities in
services/encryption
- Controlled access through database layer
- Clear user guidance on master key management in UI translations
- Consistent usage pattern across sensitive operations
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify that sensitive data is not exposed in other parts of the codebase
rg -g '!*.test.*' -g '!*.spec.*' "congMasterKey|masterKey" -A 3 -B 3
Length of output: 68130
src/states/app.ts (1)
54-54
: Verify language switching functionality across the application
The simplified language setting logic might affect other parts of the application that rely on URL-based language switching.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the results and generate additional verification scripts to check for URL-based language switching.
The first search didn't show appLangState usage, but we need to verify how the language state is managed and if there are any URL-based language switches in the routing or configuration files. This will help us determine if the change to use localStorage is safe.
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response:
The change to use localStorage for language setting is safe
The codebase consistently uses localStorage for language management:
- The language state (
appLangState
) is already initialized from localStorage with 'en' as fallback - Language switching is handled through localStorage in
useLanguage.tsx
and other components - No URL-based language switching was found in the codebase
- The i18n configuration and all language-dependent components rely on the same localStorage-based approach
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for URL-based language parameter usage
echo "Checking for URL language parameter usage..."
rg -l "lang.*URLSearchParams|URLSearchParams.*lang"
# Check for appLangState usage
echo "Checking for appLangState usage..."
rg "appLangState" --type ts --type tsx
# Check for language-related hooks
echo "Checking for language-related hooks..."
fd -e ts -e tsx | xargs rg "useAppTranslation|useTranslation"
Length of output: 65952
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for language-related state management
echo "Checking for language state management..."
rg -A 5 "appLangState|ui_lang" --type ts
# Check for language-related URL handling
echo "Checking for language URL handling..."
rg -A 5 "language.*url|url.*language" --type ts --type tsx
# Check for i18n configuration
echo "Checking for i18n configuration..."
fd -e ts -e tsx | xargs rg "i18n.*init|i18next.*init"
Length of output: 9979
...atures/ministry/report/publisher_report/monthly_report/withdraw_report/useWithdrawReport.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
...atures/ministry/report/publisher_report/monthly_report/withdraw_report/useWithdrawReport.tsx
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
organized-app Run #1765
Run Properties:
|
Project |
organized-app
|
Branch Review |
main
|
Run status |
Passed #1765
|
Run duration | 00m 05s |
Commit |
6596fd294f: chore(demo): add first report value for persons
|
Committer | rhahao |
View all properties for this run ↗︎ |
Test results | |
---|---|
Failures |
0
|
Flaky |
0
|
Pending |
0
|
Skipped |
0
|
Passing |
1
|
View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎ |
🎉 This PR is included in version 3.3.0 🎉 The release is available on GitHub release Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
No description provided.