-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Military Procedures #398
Military Procedures #398
Conversation
Adjusted Mil Airspace and Procs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Really great that someone's gotten started on this stuff! Appreciate your work
Modified based off comments
!!! phraseology | ||
**VIPR**: "Viper 1, 2, 3, 4, Brisbane Centre, Viper, Maintaining F280" | ||
**ARA**: "Viper, Brisbane Centre" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I know that the first part of this transmission is each aircraft checking in on the new frequency, but I'm wondering if it might confuse controllers to see it displayed like this. Should we start with the transmission with just 'Brisbane Centre, Viper...' and leave the check in out? I can see controllers interpreting it as the lead aircraft identifying all of the aircraft which form part of the formation, rather than separate transmissions from four different aircraft.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thats what I had initially before alphadelta modified it + only check in if its not a plannned com switch so I think the orginal idea was better.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah my bad, some crossed wires then. We'll discuss on our end
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thats what I had initially before alphadelta modified it + only check in if its not a plannned com switch so I think the orginal idea was better.
Formations do require a full check in for all members for initial contact with all civil units, whether the comm switch is planned or not. That being said, I have added a clarification line above it to establish what is going on and avoid any confusion for ATC
1aa78e2
Summary:
Updated Military Aircraft procedures and hand offs.
Changes
Fixes:
Additions: