-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Military Procedures #398
Merged
Merged
Military Procedures #398
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ea447bb
Update military.md
ST6-Bravo 7119a5e
Update military.md
ST6-Bravo 1d158bc
YPTN Procedures
ST6-Bravo 5796f8a
fix formation
alphadelta332 145b2bd
final fixes
alphadelta332 1286f11
Delete docs/aerodromes/classc/Tindal.md
ST6-Bravo fd60270
Merge branch 'vatpac-technology:main' into main
ST6-Bravo 85a7eec
remove awec
alphadelta332 310e0c0
Create Tindal.md
alphadelta332 85b83d3
Merge branch 'vatpac-technology:main' into main
ST6-Bravo 8c73496
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into pr/398
alphadelta332 77cabf5
refine formation phraseology
alphadelta332 1aa78e2
Merge branch 'main' of https://github.com/ST6-Bravo/sops into pr/398
alphadelta332 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I know that the first part of this transmission is each aircraft checking in on the new frequency, but I'm wondering if it might confuse controllers to see it displayed like this. Should we start with the transmission with just 'Brisbane Centre, Viper...' and leave the check in out? I can see controllers interpreting it as the lead aircraft identifying all of the aircraft which form part of the formation, rather than separate transmissions from four different aircraft.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thats what I had initially before alphadelta modified it + only check in if its not a plannned com switch so I think the orginal idea was better.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah my bad, some crossed wires then. We'll discuss on our end
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Formations do require a full check in for all members for initial contact with all civil units, whether the comm switch is planned or not. That being said, I have added a clarification line above it to establish what is going on and avoid any confusion for ATC