-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use Hono env adapter instead of the Deno.env()
#64
Conversation
Make the test and code clean.
Make Reproxy workable on any runtime.
WalkthroughThe changes involve significant modifications to the repository handling and environment variable management within the application. Key alterations include the removal of specific environment variable permissions in the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #64 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage 100.00% 100.00%
=========================================
Files 7 6 -1
Lines 124 109 -15
Branches 11 6 -5
=========================================
- Hits 124 109 -15 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (9)
src/libs/redirect.test.ts (1)
9-9
: Function calls updated correctly, consider adding comments for clarityThe
checkRedirect
function calls have been properly updated to include the new parameters (testRepo
andtestRef
) as per the changes in the function signature. This makes the function calls more explicit and aligns with the goal of making the code workable on any runtime.Consider adding brief comments above each test step to explain the purpose of each case, e.g.:
// Test redirect without a specific ref await t.step("normal", () => { // ... }); // Test redirect with a specific ref await t.step("with ref", () => { // ... });This would enhance the readability and maintainability of the test cases.
Also applies to: 15-15
src/libs/content.test.ts (2)
9-9
: LGTM: Test case simplified.The test case has been simplified by directly passing
testRepo
togetContent
, which aligns with the PR objective of making the code more runtime-agnostic. This change improves readability and directness.Consider destructuring the return value for improved clarity:
- const [data, status] = await getContent(testRepo); + const [content, status] = await getContent(testRepo);This makes it clearer that the first returned value represents the content.
16-16
: LGTM: Test cases consistently updated.The "with ref" and "not found" test cases have been consistently updated to directly pass the repository objects to
getContent
. This change simplifies the tests and aligns with the PR objective.For consistency with the previous suggestion, consider applying the same variable naming improvement to these test cases:
- const [data, status] = await getContent(testRepo, testRef); + const [content, status] = await getContent(testRepo, testRef); - const [data, status] = await getContent(unknownRepo); + const [content, status] = await getContent(unknownRepo);This will make the variable names consistent across all test cases and improve overall readability.
Also applies to: 23-23
src/server.ts (3)
28-41
: LGTM: Improved environment variable handling and repository object creationThe use of the
env
function from the Hono adapter and the creation of a centralizedrepository
object are excellent improvements. They enhance type safety and align with the goal of making the code runtime-agnostic.Consider adding error handling for cases where required environment variables are missing. For example:
const { REPOSITORY_OWNER, REPOSITORY_NAME, REPOSITORY_PATH, GITHUB_TOKEN } = env<{ REPOSITORY_OWNER: string; REPOSITORY_NAME: string; REPOSITORY_PATH: string; GITHUB_TOKEN: string; }>(ctx); if (!REPOSITORY_OWNER || !REPOSITORY_NAME || !REPOSITORY_PATH || !GITHUB_TOKEN) { throw new Error("Missing required environment variables"); } const repository: Repository = { owner: REPOSITORY_OWNER, name: REPOSITORY_NAME, path: REPOSITORY_PATH, };This addition would make the code more robust by explicitly handling potential configuration errors.
52-52
: LGTM: UpdatedgetContent
function call with improved parameter passingThe modification to pass the
repository
object andGITHUB_TOKEN
to thegetContent
function is a good improvement. It's consistent with the new approach and separates the token for better security practices.For improved clarity, consider destructuring the return value of
getContent
. This would make it more explicit what values are being passed toctx.text()
. For example:const [content, contentType] = await getContent(repository, ref, GITHUB_TOKEN); return ctx.text(content, contentType);This change would make the code more self-documenting and easier to understand at a glance.
Line range hint
1-60
: Overall assessment: Significant improvements in runtime compatibility and code organizationThe changes in this file successfully implement the PR's objective of making the code workable on any runtime. Key improvements include:
- Use of the Hono environment adapter for runtime-agnostic environment variable access.
- Centralization of repository information in a
repository
object.- Simplified function calls with improved parameter passing.
These changes enhance the code's flexibility, maintainability, and type safety. The modifications align well with modern TypeScript practices and should make the codebase more adaptable to different environments.
Consider documenting these changes in the project's README or documentation, especially highlighting the new environment variable requirements and the improved runtime compatibility. This will help future contributors and users understand the recent architectural improvements.
src/libs/redirect.ts (2)
17-22
: LGTM: Updated usage example for the default branch.The new example correctly demonstrates how to create and use a
Repository
object, which is consistent with the updated function signature.Consider adding a comment to explain that
"master"
is the default branch, as it's not explicitly mentioned in the function call:* const url: URL | null = checkRedirect(userAgent, repository); // Uses "master" as default branch
60-63
: LGTM: Updated checkRedirect function signature and implementation.The function signature and implementation have been correctly updated to include and use the
repository: Repository
parameter. This change aligns with the new design that avoids reliance on environment variables.Consider updating the default value for
ref
from "master" to "main", as many repositories now use "main" as the default branch name:export function checkRedirect( userAgent: UserAgent, repository: Repository, ref: string = "main", ): URL | null { const url = getGitHubUrl(repository, ref); // ... rest of the function }This change would make the function more aligned with current Git practices. However, ensure this doesn't break existing usage before implementing.
src/libs/content.ts (1)
53-59
: LGTM with a suggestion: Updated getContent function signature and implementationThe changes to the
getContent
function are well-implemented and align with the PR objectives. The addition of therepository
parameter and the optionaltoken
parameter improves flexibility and authentication management.Consider adding a type annotation for the
octokit
constant to improve code readability:- const octokit = new Octokit({ auth: token }); + const octokit: Octokit = new Octokit({ auth: token });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
- deno.json (1 hunks)
- src/libs/content.test.ts (1 hunks)
- src/libs/content.ts (2 hunks)
- src/libs/env.test.ts (0 hunks)
- src/libs/env.ts (0 hunks)
- src/libs/mod.ts (1 hunks)
- src/libs/redirect.test.ts (1 hunks)
- src/libs/redirect.ts (2 hunks)
- src/libs/test_utils.ts (0 hunks)
- src/server.ts (2 hunks)
💤 Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (3)
- src/libs/env.test.ts
- src/libs/env.ts
- src/libs/test_utils.ts
🔇 Additional comments (18)
src/libs/mod.ts (1)
3-3
: LGTM! Verify usage of the newly exported type.The addition of this export statement for the
Repository
type aligns with the PR's objective of making the project workable on any runtime. It's correctly formatted and allows other modules to use this type directly.To ensure this change is properly utilized, let's verify its usage across the codebase:
src/libs/redirect.test.ts (2)
4-4
: LGTM: Import statement updated correctlyThe import statement has been appropriately updated to include
testRepo
, which is now used in the test cases. This change aligns well with the modifications in the function calls.
Line range hint
1-19
: Overall changes improve clarity and align with PR objectivesThe modifications to this test file successfully align with the PR's goal of making the code workable on any runtime. By explicitly passing the repository information to the
checkRedirect
function, the tests become more self-contained and potentially more portable across different runtime environments.These changes improve the clarity and directness of the tests without apparent loss of functionality or test coverage. They also reflect the removal of the intermediate
exportRepo
function, as mentioned in the AI-generated summary.To ensure that these changes haven't inadvertently affected other parts of the codebase, please run the following verification script:
This script will help identify any calls to
checkRedirect
that might have been missed during the update, ensuring consistency across the codebase.src/libs/content.test.ts (2)
5-5
: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.The import statement has been appropriately updated to include
testRef
,testRepo
, andunknownRepo
. This change aligns with the modifications in the test cases where these objects are now used directly.
Line range hint
1-28
: Overall assessment: Changes improve code clarity and align with PR objectives.The modifications in this file consistently simplify the test cases by directly passing repository objects to
getContent
, removing the intermediateexportRepo
function. These changes align well with the PR objective of making the code workable on any runtime and improve overall code clarity and maintainability.Key points:
- Import statements have been correctly updated.
- All test cases have been consistently modified to use the new
getContent
function signature.- The changes maintain the original test logic while simplifying the code structure.
The only suggestions made were minor improvements in variable naming for better clarity. Overall, these changes represent a positive step towards making the codebase more flexible and runtime-agnostic.
src/server.ts (2)
3-3
: LGTM: Import changes align with PR objectivesThe addition of the
env
import from "@hono/hono/adapter" and the modification of theRepository
type import are in line with the PR's goal of making the code workable on any runtime. These changes contribute to better environment variable handling and type organization.Also applies to: 8-8
43-47
: LGTM: SimplifiedcheckRedirect
function callThe modification to pass the
repository
object to thecheckRedirect
function is a good improvement. It simplifies the function call and makes the code more maintainable by centralizing the repository information.src/libs/redirect.ts (5)
4-4
: LGTM: Import statement for Repository type.The new import statement for the
Repository
type is correctly added and necessary for the updated function signature.
27-33
: LGTM: Updated usage example for a specific branch.The example has been correctly updated to demonstrate the creation of a
Repository
object and the use of a specific branch. It accurately reflects the new function signature while maintaining consistent comment style and formatting.
38-44
: LGTM: Updated usage example for a specific tag.The example has been appropriately updated to showcase the creation of a
Repository
object and the use of a specific tag. It correctly reflects the new function signature while maintaining consistent comment style and formatting.
49-55
: LGTM: Updated usage example for a specific commit.The example has been correctly updated to illustrate the creation of a
Repository
object and the use of a specific commit hash. It accurately reflects the new function signature while maintaining consistent comment style and formatting.
Line range hint
1-66
: Overall assessment: Well-implemented changes to support runtime independence.The modifications in this file successfully implement the PR objective of making the code workable on any runtime by avoiding reliance on environment variables. The introduction of the
Repository
type and its consistent use throughout the file, including in usage examples and the function implementation, demonstrates a thoughtful and thorough approach to this change.The documentation has been kept up-to-date, which is commendable. The code is now more flexible and can potentially work across different runtime environments as intended.
Great job on maintaining code quality and consistency while implementing this significant change!
src/libs/content.ts (6)
5-5
: LGTM: Import of Repository typeThe addition of the
Repository
type import is consistent with the changes in the function signature and improves type safety and code readability.
15-20
: LGTM: Updated example for default branch usageThe example has been correctly updated to demonstrate the creation and usage of a
Repository
object, which is consistent with the new function signature. This change improves the clarity of the documentation.
24-30
: LGTM: Updated example for specific branch usageThe example has been correctly updated to demonstrate the creation and usage of a
Repository
object with a specific branch. This is consistent with the new function signature and improves the clarity of the documentation.
34-40
: LGTM: Updated example for specific tag usageThe example has been correctly updated to demonstrate the creation and usage of a
Repository
object with a specific tag. This is consistent with the new function signature and improves the clarity of the documentation.
44-50
: LGTM: Updated example for specific commit usageThe example has been correctly updated to demonstrate the creation and usage of a
Repository
object with a specific commit. This is consistent with the new function signature and improves the clarity of the documentation.
Line range hint
1-76
: Overall assessment: Excellent improvements to flexibility and documentationThe changes in this file successfully achieve the PR's objective of making the code more runtime-agnostic. The introduction of the
Repository
type and the optionaltoken
parameter in thegetContent
function significantly improves the flexibility and reusability of the code. The thorough updates to the documentation, including multiple usage examples, greatly enhance the usability of this module.These modifications align well with the goal of making the project workable on any runtime, as they remove implicit dependencies on specific environment variables or configurations. The code is now more adaptable to different usage scenarios and authentication methods.
Deno.env()
close #
🔄 Type of the Change
✏️ Description
Use the Hono env adapter to avoid Deno-dedicated API.