Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Social | Standardize connections API schema #40589

Closed

Conversation

manzoorwanijk
Copy link
Member

Supercedes #40536

Proposed changes:

  • Declare get_all_connections_for_user abstract method in Publicize_Base class
  • Update get_all_connections_for_user method in jetpack to return the data as per the new schema
  • Use get_all_connections_for_user method for script data on WPCOM
  • Add status field to wpcom/v2/connection-test-results endpoint
  • Fix PHP fatal on WPCOM when getting profile link for Threads connection
  • Changed the transient name for connections to ensure to clear old transients to avoid data mismatch

Other information:

  • Have you written new tests for your changes, if applicable?
  • Have you checked the E2E test CI results, and verified that your changes do not break them?
  • Have you tested your changes on WordPress.com, if applicable (if so, you'll see a generated comment below with a script to run)?

Jetpack product discussion

Does this pull request change what data or activity we track or use?

Testing instructions:

  • Apply D168243-code to your sandbox and point public API and your site to it.
  • Goto connections management on a Jetpack site and verify that everything works same as before like adding, removing and updating connections.
  • On a Simple site, goto editor
  • Open Jetpack sidebar
  • Verify that Connections management now opens the modal, instead of pointing to Calypso
  • In the modal, confirm that the connections show up fine.
  • Note that adding/removing connections is not yet implemented for simple sites

@manzoorwanijk manzoorwanijk added [Type] Enhancement Changes to an existing feature — removing, adding, or changing parts of it [Status] Needs Team Review labels Dec 12, 2024
@manzoorwanijk manzoorwanijk requested a review from a team December 12, 2024 12:23
@manzoorwanijk manzoorwanijk self-assigned this Dec 12, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 12, 2024

Are you an Automattician? Please test your changes on all WordPress.com environments to help mitigate accidental explosions.

  • To test on WoA, go to the Plugins menu on a WordPress.com Simple site. Click on the "Upload" button and follow the upgrade flow to be able to upload, install, and activate the Jetpack Beta plugin. Once the plugin is active, go to Jetpack > Jetpack Beta, select your plugin, and enable the update/unify-schema-for-connections-management branch.

  • To test on Simple, run the following command on your sandbox:

    bin/jetpack-downloader test jetpack update/unify-schema-for-connections-management
    

Interested in more tips and information?

  • In your local development environment, use the jetpack rsync command to sync your changes to a WoA dev blog.
  • Read more about our development workflow here: PCYsg-eg0-p2
  • Figure out when your changes will be shipped to customers here: PCYsg-eg5-p2

@github-actions github-actions bot added [Feature] Publicize Now Jetpack Social, auto-sharing [Package] Publicize [Plugin] Jetpack Issues about the Jetpack plugin. https://wordpress.org/plugins/jetpack/ [Plugin] Wpcomsh labels Dec 12, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for your PR!

When contributing to Jetpack, we have a few suggestions that can help us test and review your patch:

  • ✅ Include a description of your PR changes.
  • ✅ Add a "[Status]" label (In Progress, Needs Team Review, ...).
  • ✅ Add a "[Type]" label (Bug, Enhancement, Janitorial, Task).
  • ✅ Add testing instructions.
  • ✅ Specify whether this PR includes any changes to data or privacy.
  • ✅ Add changelog entries to affected projects

This comment will be updated as you work on your PR and make changes. If you think that some of those checks are not needed for your PR, please explain why you think so. Thanks for cooperation 🤖


The e2e test report can be found here. Please note that it can take a few minutes after the e2e tests checks are complete for the report to be available.


Follow this PR Review Process:

  1. Ensure all required checks appearing at the bottom of this PR are passing.
  2. Choose a review path based on your changes:
    • A. Team Review: add the "[Status] Needs Team Review" label
      • For most changes, including minor cross-team impacts.
      • Example: Updating a team-specific component or a small change to a shared library.
    • B. Crew Review: add the "[Status] Needs Review" label
      • For significant changes to core functionality.
      • Example: Major updates to a shared library or complex features.
    • C. Both: Start with Team, then request Crew
      • For complex changes or when you need extra confidence.
      • Example: Refactor affecting multiple systems.
  3. Get at least one approval before merging.

Still unsure? Reach out in #jetpack-developers for guidance!


Jetpack plugin:

The Jetpack plugin has different release cadences depending on the platform:

  • WordPress.com Simple releases happen semi-continuously (PCYsg-Jjm-p2).
  • WoA releases happen weekly.
  • Releases to self-hosted sites happen monthly. The next release is scheduled for January 7, 2025 (scheduled code freeze on undefined).

If you have any questions about the release process, please ask in the #jetpack-releases channel on Slack.


Wpcomsh plugin:

  • Next scheduled release: Atomic deploys happen twice daily on weekdays (p9o2xV-2EN-p2).

If you have any questions about the release process, please ask in the #jetpack-releases channel on Slack.

@manzoorwanijk manzoorwanijk force-pushed the update/unify-schema-for-connections-management branch from a771347 to 22b9c81 Compare December 12, 2024 13:37
pablinos added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2024
Expanding on #40589 this attempts to refactor the wpcom/v2 endpoints and
bring the get_all_connections_for_user method to publicize-base.

It means we start relying on the XMLRPC calls entirely, which could be a
performance problem with testing the connections.

There's probably some more refactoring we could do to proxy the
endpoints and use those within Publicize, by overriding some of the
methods, like get_publicize_conns_test_results
Copy link
Contributor

@pablinos pablinos left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've been expanding on this, and added the implementation of get_all_connections_for_user to the Publicize_Base class.

I realise we want to get away from dumping everything in there, but I wonder if this is the first knot to unpick, and then we can start moving things into separate classes or traits.

What do you think of #40604 ?

@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ public static function setup_connections_wpcom() {

public static function setup_connections_jetpack() {
set_transient(
'jetpack_social_connections',
'jetpack_social_connection_list',
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this just to be more descriptive?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Mentioned in the PR description

Changed the transient name for connections to ensure to clear old transients to avoid data mismatch

@manzoorwanijk
Copy link
Member Author

Closing in favour of #40677

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
DO NOT MERGE don't merge it! [Feature] Publicize Now Jetpack Social, auto-sharing [Package] Publicize [Plugin] Jetpack Issues about the Jetpack plugin. https://wordpress.org/plugins/jetpack/ [Plugin] Wpcomsh [Tests] Includes Tests [Type] Enhancement Changes to an existing feature — removing, adding, or changing parts of it
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants