-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
2024-12-08 update : changing center of prior. #260
2024-12-08 update : changing center of prior. #260
Conversation
@cbernalz Could you provide a comparison of the posterior estimates of the phi parameter with both priors from the fit to the exponential and the data generated from the exponential? Ideally a density plot or histogram with the priors and posteriors overlaid I am curious if with either of the prior values, the posterior estimate of the true phi is identifiable -- since this is generated with simulated data we know this.
After doing that check, I would also consider increasing phi in the generation of the simulated data above, this way the strength of the correlation as a function of distance is increased in your simulation analysis |
@kaitejohnson Here is the plot that results from the prior and posterior for |
This looks reasonable to me! Model seems to struggle in both cases a bit with identifiability but this makes sense -- between the R(t) variability and lab-site level observation noise there are a lot of drivers of variation in C(t). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM!
Regarding #259 (comment) .