-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[HOLD for payment 2024-05-02] CRITICAL: [P2P Distance] [$500] Create a new Rate field #36985
Comments
Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~0184867e0f5e71241a |
Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @getusha ( |
Triggered auto assignment to @bfitzexpensify ( |
@koko57 would you please reply to this comment so I can assign you to implement this issue? It's the largest piece of the front end implementation so I would like you to implement it, since you wrote the front end design and know it better than anyone else 🙂 |
Taking this one! 😃 |
📣 @getusha 🎉 An offer has been automatically sent to your Upwork account for the Reviewer role 🎉 Thanks for contributing to the Expensify app! |
How's this coming along? It's still a bit of a ways out, so no rush, just curious. |
Most of the UI done 😃 Same with the util functions (the one for getting the Rate for P2P will probably need to be changed a bit, I used mock data now). I will leave a detailed summary what is already done and what has to be done today EOD. I will push my changes on the branch so it can be taken over if necessary while I'm ooo. |
Pasting all the required steps for this issue with the current status:
DistanceRequestUtils.getRateForP2P
All the partially done code has TODO comments. Changes are on this branch https://github.com/koko57/App/tree/feat/36985-create-new-rate-field I'm leaving for the next week, I'll be back on 03/12 |
If you are the assigned CME please investigate whether the linked PR caused a regression and leave a comment with the results. If a regression has occurred and you are the assigned CM follow the instructions here. If this regression could have been avoided please consider also proposing a recommendation to the PR checklist so that we can avoid it in the future. |
|
The solution for this issue has been 🚀 deployed to production 🚀 in version 1.4.65-5 and is now subject to a 7-day regression period 📆. Here is the list of pull requests that resolve this issue: If no regressions arise, payment will be issued on 2024-05-02. 🎊 For reference, here are some details about the assignees on this issue:
|
BugZero Checklist: The PR adding this new feature has been merged! The following checklist (instructions) will need to be completed before the issue can be closed:
|
Looks like there were a fair number of regressions here. @neil-marcellini, what do you think a fair payout for this job is? |
It's not a bug, it was a new feature implemented by an expert from Callstack, and most features have some bugs initially, so I don't think we should reduce any pay for regressions. Also I believe most bugs were under a beta. The only payment needed is for the C+ @getusha, and I think they deserve full payment. |
@shawnborton, @neil-marcellini, @koko57, @bfitzexpensify, @getusha Uh oh! This issue is overdue by 2 days. Don't forget to update your issues! |
Thanks @neil-marcellini - @getusha, I sent you an offer for this job. |
Accepted @bfitzexpensify, thank you all! 🙇 |
Thanks! Payment complete, thanks for the work here everyone. |
Create a new Rate field following this plan. Please be sure to read and understand the relevant sections of the entire plan as well.
Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
Issue Owner
Current Issue Owner: @bfitzexpensifyThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: