-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(mempool_test_utils,starknet_integration_tests): prepare funded but undeployed accounts #2986
Conversation
Graphite Automations"Yair - Auto-assign" took an action on this PR • (12/26/24)1 assignee was added to this PR based on Yair's automation. |
3bc6015
to
73dfa81
Compare
a41d373
to
4911c62
Compare
4911c62
to
d58ba8e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed 5 of 5 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @yair-starkware)
crates/starknet_integration_tests/src/state_reader.rs
line 412 at r1 (raw file):
} // TODO(deploy_account_support): delete method once we have batcher with execution.
Can we delete this here and deploy accounts only with txs now that you have added support for that?
Code quote:
// TODO(deploy_account_support): delete method once we have batcher with execution.
73dfa81
to
f9cecc3
Compare
d58ba8e
to
e427a44
Compare
f9cecc3
to
51914aa
Compare
e427a44
to
b93ddd4
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewable status: 0 of 5 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @alonh5)
crates/starknet_integration_tests/src/state_reader.rs
line 412 at r1 (raw file):
Previously, alonh5 (Alon Haramati) wrote…
Can we delete this here and deploy accounts only with txs now that you have added support for that?
Isn't it used by the integration test as well?
Previously, yair-starkware (Yair) wrote…
IMO this whole module shouldn't exist. |
51914aa
to
1fad30b
Compare
b93ddd4
to
4a533d6
Compare
1fad30b
to
53d5540
Compare
4a533d6
to
b22ca41
Compare
53d5540
to
7e8fb71
Compare
b22ca41
to
bc8f41c
Compare
7e8fb71
to
5d87a2d
Compare
bc8f41c
to
cbcaa88
Compare
5d87a2d
to
58e23fe
Compare
cbcaa88
to
b3da587
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed 5 of 5 files at r2, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 2 unresolved discussions (waiting on @yair-starkware)
crates/starknet_integration_tests/src/state_reader.rs
line 412 at r1 (raw file):
Yes you're right it's used in the integration test.
Needs to be part of the
MultiAccountTxGenerator
Do you think it's easy and we should do it now?
crates/starknet_integration_tests/src/state_reader.rs
line 427 at r2 (raw file):
} // TODO(deploy_account_support): delete method once we have batcher with execution.
Here you can remove it right?
Code quote:
// TODO(deploy_account_support): delete method once we have batcher with execution.
58e23fe
to
826fdb0
Compare
8bff41f
to
4527d59
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewable status: 4 of 5 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @alonh5)
crates/starknet_integration_tests/src/state_reader.rs
line 412 at r1 (raw file):
Previously, alonh5 (Alon Haramati) wrote…
Yes you're right it's used in the integration test.
Needs to be part of the
MultiAccountTxGenerator
Do you think it's easy and we should do it now?
I don't think it's that easy.
I think we should do it before adding more flows to the e2e tests.
crates/starknet_integration_tests/src/state_reader.rs
line 427 at r2 (raw file):
Previously, alonh5 (Alon Haramati) wrote…
Here you can remove it right?
The functions are still needed because we can't update the state with the transfer txs yet.
Also, I think it's a useful functionality for easy setups (instead of needing to fund, declare and deploy every contract in every test).
Removed the TODOs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed 2 of 2 files at r3, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @yair-starkware)
crates/starknet_integration_tests/src/state_reader.rs
line 412 at r1 (raw file):
Previously, yair-starkware (Yair) wrote…
I don't think it's that easy.
I think we should do it before adding more flows to the e2e tests.
Okay, can you add a TODO for it then?
crates/starknet_integration_tests/src/state_reader.rs
line 427 at r2 (raw file):
Previously, yair-starkware (Yair) wrote…
The functions are still needed because we can't update the state with the transfer txs yet.
Also, I think it's a useful functionality for easy setups (instead of needing to fund, declare and deploy every contract in every test).
Removed the TODOs.
Yes I only meant remove the TODO here.
826fdb0
to
8f67a10
Compare
4527d59
to
4a3e777
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r4, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @yair-starkware)
8f67a10
to
022ce3a
Compare
4a3e777
to
dce8816
Compare
…ut undeployed accounts
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewable status: 1 of 5 files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @alonh5)
crates/starknet_integration_tests/src/state_reader.rs
line 412 at r1 (raw file):
Previously, alonh5 (Alon Haramati) wrote…
Okay, can you add a TODO for it then?
Done
dce8816
to
dc872fc
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reviewed 3 of 4 files at r5, 1 of 1 files at r6, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @yair-starkware)
No description provided.