fix(Field service reports): bug preventing page to open #2489
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant structural changes to several components related to group management in the application. The Changes
Possibly related PRs
Warning Rate limit exceeded@rhahao has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 12 minutes and 3 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (12)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- src/features/congregation/field_service_groups/group_members/useGroupMembers.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/features/reports/field_service/selector_stats/person_filter/index.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/features/reports/field_service/selector_stats/person_filter/usePersonFilter.tsx (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (6)
src/features/reports/field_service/selector_stats/person_filter/index.tsx (2)
29-29: LGTM!The code change is approved.
52-63: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
src/features/reports/field_service/selector_stats/person_filter/usePersonFilter.tsx (2)
71-73: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
81-81: LGTM!The code change is approved.
src/features/congregation/field_service_groups/group_members/useGroupMembers.tsx (2)
39-43: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
46-70: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (9)
- src/features/congregation/field_service_groups/group_delete/index.tsx (3 hunks)
- src/features/congregation/field_service_groups/group_delete/index.types.ts (1 hunks)
- src/features/congregation/field_service_groups/group_edit/index.tsx (4 hunks)
- src/features/congregation/field_service_groups/group_edit/index.types.ts (1 hunks)
- src/features/congregation/field_service_groups/group_item/edit_delete_dialog/index.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/features/congregation/field_service_groups/group_item/edit_delete_dialog/index.types.ts (1 hunks)
- src/features/congregation/field_service_groups/group_item/header/index.tsx (3 hunks)
- src/features/congregation/field_service_groups/group_item/header/useHeader.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/features/reports/field_service/report_details/index.tsx (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- src/features/congregation/field_service_groups/group_edit/index.types.ts
- src/features/reports/field_service/report_details/index.tsx
Additional comments not posted (14)
src/features/congregation/field_service_groups/group_delete/index.types.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-5: LGTM, but verify the impact on the component.The removal of the
openproperty is approved.However, ensure that this change is thoroughly tested to confirm that the
GroupDeletecomponent behaves as expected and that the removal of theopenproperty does not introduce any issues.Run the following script to verify the component usage:
Verification successful
Removal of
openProperty Verified: TheGroupDeletecomponent does not use theopenproperty in its identified usage, confirming that its removal does not impact the component's behavior.
- Location of usage:
src/features/congregation/field_service_groups/group_item/edit_delete_dialog/index.tsxScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `GroupDelete` component. # Test: Search for the component usage. Expect: No direct usage of the `open` prop. rg --type typescript -A 5 $'<GroupDelete'Length of output: 77
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `GroupDelete` component. # Test: Search for the component usage in .ts and .tsx files. Expect: No direct usage of the `open` prop. rg --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' -A 5 '<GroupDelete'Length of output: 704
src/features/congregation/field_service_groups/group_item/edit_delete_dialog/index.types.ts (1)
1-10: LGTM!The code is approved.
src/features/congregation/field_service_groups/group_item/edit_delete_dialog/index.tsx (1)
1-35: LGTM!The code is approved.
src/features/congregation/field_service_groups/group_delete/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint
14-33: Verify the impact of removing the modal dialog on the user experience.The removal of the
Dialogcomponent significantly changes the user interface and interaction model for group deletion. The absence of the modal dialog may affect how users perceive and interact with the feature.Ensure that the changes are thoroughly tested to confirm a smooth user experience. Consider the following:
- Verify that the group deletion feature functions as expected without the modal dialog.
- Assess the usability and intuitiveness of the new interaction model.
- Gather user feedback to understand the impact of the changes on their workflow.
Run the following script to navigate and analyze the relevant code:
Verification successful
Removal of
DialogComponent fromGroupDeleteDoes Not Impact User ExperienceThe
GroupDeletecomponent is used within theEditDeleteDialogcomponent, which still manages the dialog functionality. The removal of theDialogcomponent fromGroupDeletedoes not affect the user experience, as the dialog is still controlled by the parent component. TheonCloseprop andhandleDeleteGroupfunction are used appropriately within this context.
- The
GroupDeletecomponent is part of theEditDeleteDialog, which manages its own dialog.- The
onCloseprop is used extensively for dialog closures across the codebase.- The
handleDeleteGroupfunction handles deletion logic withinGroupDelete.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of removing the modal dialog on the user experience. # Test 1: Search for usage of the `GroupDelete` component. Expect: Relevant parent components. rg --type typescript -A 5 $'GroupDelete' # Test 2: Search for the `onClose` prop usage. Expect: Relevant parent components. rg --type typescript -A 5 $'onClose=' # Test 3: Search for the `handleDeleteGroup` function usage. Expect: Relevant event handlers. rg --type typescript -A 5 $'handleDeleteGroup'Length of output: 227
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of removing the modal dialog on the user experience. # Test 1: Search for usage of the `GroupDelete` component. Expect: Relevant parent components. rg --type ts -A 5 $'GroupDelete' # Test 2: Search for the `onClose` prop usage. Expect: Relevant parent components. rg --type ts -A 5 $'onClose=' # Test 3: Search for the `handleDeleteGroup` function usage. Expect: Relevant event handlers. rg --type ts -A 5 $'handleDeleteGroup'Length of output: 75222
src/features/congregation/field_service_groups/group_item/header/useHeader.tsx (4)
12-13: LGTM!The consolidation of the
editandisDeletestates into a singledlgOpenstate and atypevariable simplifies the state management while preserving the functionality.
46-49: LGTM!The modifications to the
handleOpenEditfunction align with the consolidated state management and preserve the functionality of opening the edit dialog.
51-51: LGTM!The introduction of the
handleCloseDialogfunction consolidates the logic for closing the dialog while preserving the functionality.
54-54: LGTM!The modifications to the
handleOpenDeletefunction and the inclusion of thedlgOpenandtypevariables in the return statement align with the consolidated state management while preserving the functionality.Also applies to: 64-65, 67-67
src/features/congregation/field_service_groups/group_edit/index.tsx (2)
Line range hint
23-65: Verify the impact of removing the dialog on the component's integration and user experience.The removal of the
Dialogcomponent suggests a shift in how theGroupEditcomponent is displayed and integrated within other components. The changes indicate a rethinking of the component's presentation and interaction model.Ensure that the changes are thoroughly tested to confirm a smooth integration and user experience. Consider the following:
- Verify that the
GroupEditcomponent functions as expected without the dialog wrapper.- Assess the impact of the changes on the component's layout and responsiveness.
- Ensure that the component integrates seamlessly with its parent components and the overall application flow.
- Gather user feedback to understand the implications of the new presentation and interaction model.
Run the following script to navigate and analyze the relevant code:
Verification successful
Removal of Dialog Component from GroupEdit Verified
The removal of the
Dialogcomponent from theGroupEditcomponent does not negatively impact its integration or user experience. TheGroupEditcomponent is still used within a dialog context, managed by the parentEditDeleteDialogcomponent. This change enhances the separation of concerns and increases the potential for reusability of theGroupEditcomponent. TheonCloseandonDeleteprops are still actively used, maintaining the component's functionality.
GroupEditis used withinEditDeleteDialog, which wraps it in aDialog.- The
onCloseandonDeleteprops are integrated into the application flow.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of removing the dialog on the component's integration and user experience. # Test 1: Search for usage of the `GroupEdit` component. Expect: Relevant parent components. rg --type typescript -A 5 $'GroupEdit' # Test 2: Search for the `onClose` prop usage. Expect: Relevant parent components. rg --type typescript -A 5 $'onClose=' # Test 3: Search for the `onDelete` prop usage. Expect: Relevant parent components. rg --type typescript -A 5 $'onDelete='Length of output: 217
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of removing the dialog on the component's integration and user experience. # Test 1: Search for usage of the `GroupEdit` component. Expect: Relevant parent components. rg --type ts -A 5 $'GroupEdit' # Test 2: Search for the `onClose` prop usage. Expect: Relevant parent components. rg --type ts -A 5 $'onClose=' # Test 3: Search for the `onDelete` prop usage. Expect: Relevant parent components. rg --type ts -A 5 $'onDelete='Length of output: 88850
42-42: Verify the purpose and impact of thedisableAutoStretchprop.The
disableAutoStretchprop has been added to the button component, but its specific implications are not detailed in the provided diff.Ensure that the purpose and impact of the prop are clearly understood and documented. Consider the following:
- Verify the intended behavior of the
disableAutoStretchprop and how it affects the button's styling or functionality.- Ensure that the prop is consistently used across similar button instances if applicable.
- Update the component's documentation or code comments to clearly explain the purpose and usage of the
disableAutoStretchprop.Run the following script to navigate and analyze the relevant code:
Verification successful
The
disableAutoStretchprop controls button width.The
disableAutoStretchprop is used to determine whether a button should stretch to fill its container or maintain an auto width. By default, the button stretches (disableAutoStretchisfalse). This prop is consistently used across various components to manage button styling.
- Button Component Definition: The prop is defined in
src/components/button/index.tsxand affects the button's width.- Usage: Found in multiple files, including
src/features/reports/field_service/report_details/index.tsxandsrc/features/congregation/field_service_groups/group_edit/index.tsx.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the purpose and impact of the `disableAutoStretch` prop. # Test 1: Search for usage of the `disableAutoStretch` prop. Expect: Relevant button components. rg --type typescript -A 5 $'disableAutoStretch' # Test 2: Search for the button component's definition. Expect: Relevant component file. fd --type file --extension tsx --exec rg --type typescript -A 10 $'const Button'Length of output: 41323
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the purpose and impact of the `disableAutoStretch` prop. # Test 1: Search for usage of the `disableAutoStretch` prop. Expect: Relevant button components. rg --type tsx -A 5 'disableAutoStretch' # Test 2: Search for the button component's definition. Expect: Relevant component file. fd --type file --extension tsx --exec rg --type tsx -A 10 'const Button'Length of output: 33070
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the purpose and impact of the `disableAutoStretch` prop. # Test 1: Search for usage of the `disableAutoStretch` prop in .tsx files. rg 'disableAutoStretch' --glob '*.tsx' -A 5 # Test 2: Search for the button component's definition in .tsx files. fd --type file --extension tsx --exec rg 'const Button' --glob '*.tsx' -A 10Length of output: 3912
src/features/congregation/field_service_groups/group_item/header/index.tsx (4)
9-9: LGTM!The import statement is correct and consistent with the file changes.
22-24: LGTM!The destructured properties are consistent with the component changes.
38-47: Verify theonDeleteprop.The component usage is correct and consistent with the component changes.
However, the
onDeleteprop is passedhandleOpenDeleteinstead ofhandleCloseDialog. Please verify if this is the intended behavior.
Line range hint
1-8:Also applies to: 10-21, 25-37, 48-80
organized-app
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project |
organized-app
|
| Branch Review |
main
|
| Run status |
|
| Run duration | 00m 10s |
| Commit |
|
| Committer | rhahao |
| View all properties for this run ↗︎ | |
| Test results | |
|---|---|
Failures
|
0
|
Flaky
|
0
|
Pending
|
0
|
Skipped
|
0
|
Passing
|
1
|
| View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎ | |
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 2.130.0 🎉 The release is available on GitHub release Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
No description provided.